Skip to main content

Posts

Featured

2.3 The Story of Alcochete: Mustafá

To recap the last post we took a more in depth look at the prosecutor for the case, Cândida Vilar. We questioned whether there were grounds for the case to be tried as terrorism? We suggested from a statement provided by Fernando Mendes that actually Bruno de Carvalho had encouraged him to go to Alcochete on May 15th, 2018 and knew full well that some fans were intending on going and as to why, even if realistically he couldn't have envisaged what actually occurred on the day. We've already learned towards pointing the finger at Fernando Mendes and Tiago Silva for moral authorship of the attacks. Having let de Carvalho off the hook based on what was presented previously, in light of Fernando's comments we asked whether he could or should have been tried under Articles 26 and 27 of Portuguese law. Because if Mendes' claims were true then maybe he did have something to legally answer for. Especially if the players might have chosen to take a civil case out against him at ...

Latest posts

2.2 The Story of Alcochete: The Vanity Project

2.1 The story of Alcochete: The story within the story

1.25 The Rise and Fall of Bruno de Carvalho: The appendices

1.24 The Rise and Fall of Bruno de Carvalho: It was annoying